“I have read almost all of your interviews and they are always wonderful. …  I am really looking forward to the next installment of Dialogues on Disability.” — Adrian Piper

“The Dialogues on Disability platform … has been very helpful to me, especially at times where I did not feel I belong in the world of academic philosophy.” — Disabled graduate student

Please join me here next Wednesday for the sixtieth installment of Dialogues on Disability, the series of interviews that I’ve conducted with disabled philosophers since April 2015.

The series is designed to provide a public venue for discussion with disabled philosophers about a range of topics, including their philosophical work on disability; the place of philosophy of disability vis-à-vis the discipline and profession; their experiences of institutional discrimination and personal prejudice in philosophy, in particular, and in academia, more generally; resistance to ableism, racism, sexism, and other apparatuses of power; accessibility; and anti-oppressive pedagogy.

In this upcoming installment of the series, I will talk to a disabled philosopher about depression, productivity, and the academic job market; disrupting the “work outside of philosophy” narrative; philosophy and alienation; and much, much more!

If you missed any of the previous installments in the Dialogues on Disability series, you will find them archived on BIOPOLITICAL PHILOSOPHY here:  https://biopoliticalphilosophy.com/dialogues-on-disability/

I acknowledge that the land on which I sit to conduct these interviews is the traditional territory of the Haudenosaunee and Anishnaabeg, covered by the Upper Canada Treaties and directly adjacent to Haldiman Treaty territory. I offer these interviews with respect and the aim of decolonization.

Follow BIOPOLITICAL PHILOSOPHY on Twitter at @biopoliticalph