“I have read almost all of your interviews and they are always wonderful. …  I am really looking forward to the next installment of Dialogues on Disability.” — Adrian Piper

“The Dialogues on Disability platform … has been very helpful to me, especially at times where I did not feel I belong in the world of academic philosophy.” — Disabled graduate student

Please join me here next Wednesday for the fifty-third installment of Dialogues on Disability, the series of interviews that I’m conducting with disabled philosophers and post to BIOPOLITICAL PHILOSOPHY on the third Wednesday of every month.

The series is designed to provide a public venue for discussion with disabled philosophers about a range of topics, including their philosophical work on disability; the place of philosophy of disability vis-à-vis the discipline and profession; their experiences of institutional discrimination and personal prejudice in philosophy, in particular, and in academia, more generally; resistance to ableism, racism, sexism, and other apparatuses of power; accessibility; and anti-oppressive pedagogy.

In the upcoming installment of the series, I will talk to a disabled philosopher about love for philosophy of physics; institutional noncompliance and disabled graduate students; disability, the philosophy job market, and the tenure track; and much, much more.

If you missed last month’s fantastic interview with Lissa Skitolsky, you can find that here.

Links to the entire series to date can be found here.

Follow BIOPOLITICAL PHILOSOPHY on Twitter @biopoliticalph