“I have read almost all of your interviews and they are always wonderful. …  I am really looking forward to the next installment of Dialogues on Disability.” — Adrian Piper

“The Dialogues on Disability platform … has been very helpful to me, especially at times where I did not feel I belong in the world of academic philosophy.” — Disabled graduate student

Whether you are a regular reader/listener of BIOPOLITICAL PHILOSOPHY or discovered this blog only recently, I invite you to join me this coming Wednesday for the fifty-fifth installment of Dialogues on Disability, the series of interviews that I’m conducting with disabled philosophers and post here on the third Wednesday of each month.

The series is designed to provide a public venue for discussion with disabled philosophers about a range of topics, including their philosophical work on disability; the place of philosophy of disability vis-à-vis the discipline and profession; their experiences of institutional discrimination and personal prejudice in philosophy, in particular, and in academia, more generally; resistance to ableism, racism, sexism, and other apparatuses of power; accessibility; and anti-oppressive pedagogy.

In the upcoming installment of the series, I will talk to a disabled philosopher about domestic violence, the analytic-continental divide, ableism and feminist philosophy, ableism and performance standards, and much, much more!

If you missed last month’s outstanding interview with Alison Reiheld, you can find that here: https://biopoliticalphilosophy.com/2019/09/18/dialogues-on-disability-shelley-tremain-interviews-alison-reiheld/

The entire Dialogues on Disability series is archived on BIOPOLITICAL PHILOSOPHY here: https://biopoliticalphilosophy.com/dialogues-on-disability/

Follow Dialogues on Disability at @biopoliticalph